.
.........................."We must be global Christians with a global vision because our God is a global God." - John Stott

Friday, May 7, 2010

Diocese turns its back on Christ to keep schools open

.
In an effort reminiscent of ancient Israelites who took up the traditions and icons of their neighbors every time they were afraid God wouldn't or couldn't help them with their troubles, New York and Washington DC Catholic dioceses have given up their right and duty to train up children in the way they should be - in return for public funding.  DC Archbishop Donald W. Wuerl, converted seven of the District's 28 Catholic schools into secular charter schools in 2008.  Now, a Catholic archdiocese in Indiana plans to change its parochial schools into public charter schools this next year.

In order to do this, the diocese must agree not to teach the kids anything at all about God, and remove every decoration or figure that is associated with Christianity. In Indiana, this includes removing large limestone crosses that are part of the outside wall of the buildings.

Now, I'm not big on statues and icons. However, I am even less big on turning ones back on what one believes for the sake of a monetary goal.

I understand from reports that the Diocese believes this is necessary in order that the schools stay open in needy communities.  In other words, the Diocese has decided that a neighborhood academic experience is more important to the well-being of these children and communities than knowledge of Jesus Christ.  Does this Diocese not believe in the full teaching of the Gospel?  If not, perhaps they are correct that they as a team should not be teaching it.

This isn't about Catholic bashing.  This is about one group of Christian leaders making a very wrong decision.  I was raised in Catholic schools. My aunt, a Franciscan Nun, taught in a Catholic high school most of her life. We, as Christians, have been instructed to teach children the Good News. Catholic schools, I had thought, were founded with the express purpose of doing just that. 

I can't believe any truly believing Christian would agree to take a prayerful school and turn it secular for the purpose of collecting government money.

"Train a child in the way he should go, and when he is old he will not turn from it." Proverbs 22:6
"Impress them on your children. Talk about them when you sit at home and when you walk along the road, when you lie down and when you get up." Deuteronomy 6:7
"Fathers, do not exasperate your children; instead, bring them up in the training and instruction of the Lord." Ephesians 6:4

In the first place, the 'government' can't afford to be funding everything.  Its going bankrupt, remember? As citizens, we need to be finding creative ways to make ends meet without depending on the government.

Secondly, there are wonderfully creative ways to teach children with little money.  Ask any homeschooling mother.  I also remember my mom telling me the story of her first year at a newly built Catholic school in the 1940's. The classrooms hadn't been completed yet, so they gathered in the cafeteria and separated the classes by hanging blankets.  She remembered that year fondly. 

In other words, get over the idea that everything that you think is needed is really needed.

But thirdly, and most importantly, God does tremendous things through prayer. Have none of these people ever heard of George Mueller? For those that don't know, he fed hundreds of orphans through the years totally through faith and prayer. Some of the ways the Lord answered and provided were truly miraculous. There are many other examples of brave prayer warriors through out history. What Mother Theresa was able to do through faith and determination was amazing. Leaving God out of her ministry was not an option.

Haven't any of these people read the Bible?  Don't think prayer can do the job?  Believers know that God answers prayer. Sure, sometimes the answer is "no."  But if it is, then praise God for putting a hold on something that might not have been the best idea in the first place.  He sees things that we don't and has the ultimate wisdom as to how to accomplish needed goals - including the best way to teach children.  But other times, when we are headed in the right direction, the answer is a miraculously yes. 

Our family has had several experiences.  Fifteen years ago, while my husband was driving across country, I waited at home and prayed.  He was on his way to pick up four of his relatives' children that were suddenly and unexpectedly in need a home. I prayed about how we would feed them when we could barely feed ourselves.  But it was an emergency and my husband knew he had no other choice but to jump in the car and go.  The next day, straight out of a George Mueller play book, a friend, unaware my husband had left to pick up children, showed up with a car full of supplies, including a summer's worth of blue diapers.  I didn't have a small boy in my home that needed them...but my husband would be bringing an 18-month old boy home in a couple days. They were just the right size.

Apparently, a grocery store Semi had overturned at the corner in front of our friends house.  The driver had told him to go ahead and gather the products strewn all over highway.

That event has always amazed me and I love to tell the story.  Did I mention that the diapers were even blue, not pink? (this was during that brief period that they were selling them that way)  Amazing - God having fun with even the smallest details. 

Five years later, we were praying that if the Lord wanted our family to help at a Children's home in Juarez, Mexico, he would provide a comfortable way for my husband, who was dying of bone cancer, to travel.  That little boy with the blue diapers, now six, prayed that the Lord would give us an RV.  After the prayer, I gently told him that we could pray for help, but it's not right to ask for things so bluntly.  A week later, a woman called and asked if she could give us a huge, 10 bunk RV.  Needless to say, we went on that Children's home in Mexico.

Others might doubt God's providence, but those experiences, as well as a few others, spoke quite loudly to me.

That isn't to say that I've never forgotten, gotten scared, and gone ahead without prayer - making a bad decision that I later regretted. But...at the very least, I would be terrified to take a step such as the one these dioceses are making - To decide government funding is a priority over teaching Jesus Christ to the children.  I would be terrified as to the consequences that the leadership is bringing on themselves.

Even the thought of taking such a step is stomach turning.  I pray that the Indiana diocese prayerfully rethinks turning its back on the spiritual needs these children have.  One would hope that the faithful of the church in Indianapolis will not follow in the ways of New York and DC, but would instead pray for God's providence, leaning on the Lord rather than turning their back on Jesus and depending on the government.
.

Monday, May 3, 2010

Theology of Atonement - Part IV, the New Testament

.
Continued from Part III - The Ritual

There needed to be a way to remove the stain of moral and spiritual guilt. This method had to be a way that would cleanse us of totally from every sin. Isaiah 53 and Daniel 9:14-27 prophesied that the Coming Messiah would be the Great Atonement for all of our sins. Our Lord Jesus himself taught that He was that Messiah. (Matt. 26:28).

Isa. 53:10 (Sept.) states, "He (the Messiah) came in the likeness of sinful flesh because He was a sin offering." Isaiah is called the Old Testament Evangelist because of his vivid descriptions of Christ's suffering, atonement and reward. (Isa. 42:1-7, 53:1-12) Christ's soul was to be given as an offering for sin. This passage, with recurring reference to the Messiah as the "Servant of the Lord", proves that Isaiah, and probably other Israelites, believed that the Messiah would come as a suffering substitute with the goal of redeeming man. In ancient Israel, it was known that this passage was referring to the Messiah. More modern interpretations, which claim that the passage refers to the state of Israel rather than a man, fail to explain why the writer would refer to the state in the third person, and to the citizens in the first person. If modern interpreters were to be correct, it would only makes sense if the writer would have referred to all as the state.

Jesus’s is our sacrificial lamb, and His sacrificial death on the cross and blood spilled is the final and complete atonement for our sins. He was a sacrifice, not because his killers thought of him as such and were in a worshipful, repentant mode when they nailed him to the cross, but because He, without sin or blemish, went willingly to the cross. Jesus, in His heart, took all man's sin upon Himself and bore the punishment others deserved. He sacrificed Himself for man's sake. In Romans 8:3, (Sept.) "Amartia" is used to mean, "made sin," not a "sinner." The term "sinner" can never be used in reference to Christ, who is sinless and a "sin bearer". The term "sin" in reference to Jesus is abstract, without an article - an abstract noun for the concrete. Jesus is "made sin" for men in the same way men are "made righteous" for God: by a judicial act of God. And God, in His righteousness, accepted Jesus's bloody sacrifice of Himself.

This is hard for people of the 20th Century to understand. Man tries to comprehend the importance of the blood, but doesn't understand why it is important. But the blood isn’t for man in the first place; it is God that values the Blood. This is where man needs to have faith that the Blood is important simply because God says so.

According to Evangelist Watchman Nee, the Blood is meant to forgive and wash away sins in the lives of men. The cross is to do away with the power of sin in the lives of men. The Blood is an atonement, and sinners are forgiven not because God overlooks the sin, but because he sees the Blood. Therefore, the Blood is primarily for God, not for man.

It’s important to have faith AND clear conscience toward God, which can only come by the blood, and not anything else. Being extra kind or patient one day does not bring one closer to God. Man can never be good enough. The Blood is unchanging and is man's only hope for safe ground to stand on. The only important matter is that God values sacrificial, righteous blood shed.

The last aspect of the purpose for the Blood is the part “the accuser” plays. When Satan entered after the fall, man became separated from God. As long as sin was present in the life of man, God couldn’t be approached and Satan had a field day. Without atonement, God couldn’t do anything to help. He couldn’t come near. But the blood changed that. God can stand next to man now.

But the Blood doesn't “cleanse” hearts. The flesh is too bad for cleansing, and it must be thrown out, crucified, and replaced with a whole new heart. This is why the animal sacrifices alone were never adequate. Death and rebirth is still necessary. The old hearts were “sprinkled with an evil conscience”, and that caused a barrier between God and man. When man tried to approach God, he felt guilt and unworthiness. This is why man needs both the Blood and a death - a tossing out of that old heart so a new one could be put in its place. Man must die on the cross, with the Messiah, Jesus, in order to gain new life. When a sinner believes this from the Word and accepts Christ's gift of death into his heart, his conscience can be cleared and the guilt removed.

The Book of Romans shows us that
1. The Grace of God, our Divine Judge, is the giver and justifier of our full atonement.
2. The blood of Christ is the basis of our full atonement
3. Faith is the receptive organ for our full atonement
4. Justice and Grace will be the end result of our full atonement

Old Testament sacrifices were a foreshadowing of the redemption Jesus Christ was going to bring about on the cross. For reasons only God can fully understand, Christ's shed blood on the cross is a vitally important event, and the only event, which brings about reconciliation and atonement for all sinners who believe and receive it.

END
.

Saturday, May 1, 2010

Christian Newspapers, News Sources

.


Christian News Sources

Adventist Review


Agape Press

Assist News Service - World News


Associated Baptist Press

Barna Group: Examine, Illuminate, Transform


Baptist Press News

BC Christian News - Canada


BCNN1.com: Black Christian News

Blue Ridge Christian News


Books & Culture

BosNewsLife - Budapest


Breaking Christian News

Canadian Christianity.com


Catholic News Service; Catholic Online

CBN News; Christian World News


Charisma News Online; CNS Magazine

Christian Examiner


Christian Headlines

Christian Journal


Christian Music Daily

Christian News (The Christian News)


Christian News Daily

Christian News Northwest


Christian News Today

Christian Newswire


Christian Personal Finance

Christian Post


Christian Press.com

Christian Start


Christian Telegraph

Christian Today


Christianity Today

Christians Unite - News


Christians Unite - Columns

ChristianWeek.org - Canada


Church Finance Today

Church Law & Tax Report


Citizen USA - (out of Ohio)

Compass Direct News


Crosswalk.com

DeMoss News.com


Faith News Network

Family News in Focus


Forum 18 News Service

Good News, etc.- San Diego


Good News: Magazine of Understanding

Good News Today


Heartlight, Inc.

Intermountain Christian News


International Faith Telegraph

Israel Insider


JesusJournal.com

Kyria.com - Women Chosen in Christ


LifeNews.com

LifeSightNews.com


Lucianne.com

The Manna


Medical Missionary News

Mission Network News


One News Now

Open Doors USA.com


Persecution.com

Preaching Today


Religion News Today

Sojourners Magazine


Spirit Daily.com

Topix Christian News


True News

United News


Winsome Wit - Christian Humor

Wisconsin Christian News


World Mag.com

World News Sources


Worthy Christian News


More Christian News, Resources and Media at http://www.christsinternet.com/

.